The Kenosha News, beyond all logic, has decided to endorse my opponent. But thanks to their confused editorial board I would like to share with you their wisdom. In the 3/27/08 edition they endorsed my opponent with the following,"For 18 years, Frank Pacetti has been a leader on the council and generally been a voice of reason and common sense. He is opposed this election by Michael Orth, a first-time candidate, who contends that the incumbent is not responsive to residents.At times it might be fair to say that Pacetti's speaking style is less than diplomatic or even blunt, but we generally find it refreshingly clear, and we believe that the City Council needs his experience and leadership. We recommend a vote for Pacetti."I have never challenged Mr. Pacetti's experience, but rather his lack of responsiveness to the districts needs. In my statement published in the 3/25/08 Kenosha News it was reported that,
"Since the April 2006 election our alderman has missed 40 percent of city council meetings."Now today, 3/28/08 the Kenosha News in its endorsements for County Board the editors supported Mark Modory stating,
"When the Kenosha News checked attendance records for county supervisors last year, we found most members of the County Board had very good records. There were two exceptions. One was a member who had surgery and had been recovering in a nursing home. The other was 10th District Supervisor David Arrington, who missed 10 of 30 County Board meetings and 10 of 37 committee meetings in the 14-month period examined. At one point, the Board took the unusual step of having the minutes show one of his absences as unexcused, an effort that carried no penalty but expressed supervisors' frustration with their colleague's frequent absences. We share their opinion."The Kenosha News correctly states that it is unacceptable for a County Board Supervisor to miss 33% of the scheduled meetings, yet they endorsed Frank Pacetti who missed 40% of City Council meetings since the last election in 2006. That is confused logic!
Here is a detailed accounting of Alderman Pacetti's attendance:April 17, 2006 Present
May 01, 2006 Present
May 15, 2006 Present
June 05, 2006 Present
June 19, 2006 ABSENT
July 05, 2006 Present
July 17, 2006 Present
August 07, 2006 ABSENT
August 21, 2006 ABSENT
September 06, 2006 ABSENT
September 18, 2006 ABSENT
October 02, 2006 Present
October 16, 2006 Present
November 06, 2006 ABSENT
November 20, 2006 Present
November 28, 2006 Present
November 29, 2006 ABSENT
December 04, 2006 ABSENT
December 18, 2006 Present
January 03, 2007 Present
January 17, 2007 Present
February 05, 2007 ABSENT
February 21, 2007 ABSENT
March 05, 2007 ABSENT
March 19, 2007 Present
April 02, 2007 Present
April 16, 2007 Present
May 07, 2007 Present
May 21, 2007 Present
June 04, 2007 ABSENT
June 18, 2007 Present
July 02, 2007 ABSENT
July 16, 2007 ABSENT
August 06, 2007 ABSENT
August 20, 2007 Present
September 05, 2007 Present
September 17, 2007 Present
October 01, 2007 ABSENT
October 15, 2007 Present
November 05, 2007 ABSENT
November 19, 2007 ABSENT
December 03, 2007 Present
December 04, 2007 Present
December 05, 2007 Present
December 17, 2007 Present
January 23, 2008 ABSENT
February 04, 2008 Present
February 20, 2008 Present
March 03, 2008 Present
March 17, 2008 ABSENT
Meetings Missed: 20
Total Meetings: 50
Total Missed: 40%You Deserve Better Representation!Other inconsistencies in their endorsements:
The Kenosha News endorsed Keith Rosenberg “because of his early commitment to the race and because of his enthusiastic knock-on-every door campaigning.“ While Frank Pacetti turned in his nomination signatures at the last moment and has done absolutely NO campaigning in the 15th district whatsoever.
The Kenosha News endorsed Kathy Carpenter because Kurt Sinclair, “is less engaged with the district than in the past.” I have yet to meet a citizen in the 15th district who is satisfied with Alderman Pacetti’s “engagement”. He has missed 40% of City Council meetings since the last election, and the most frequent complaint I hear is that constituents have not had simple phone calls or emails returned.
And finally it strikes me as odd that the editors, who never speak directly with the candidates, are the ones doing the endorsements. This seems to give a ridiculous advantage to the incumbents. Note that of the 10 contested races with an incumbent running the Kenosha News endorsed 9 of 10 current aldermen!
Labels: endorsement, Kenosha News